Back to Blog
4 min read

How We Scaled Venue Data Processing in AustinsElite with IQR-Based Normalization and Caching

The Messy Reality of Real-World Venue Data

When we launched AustinsElite, we knew we’d be dealing with a wide variety of venues—each with their own way of tracking events, guest counts, and staff hours. What we didn’t expect was just how inconsistent that data would be. One venue logs 500 guests for a small DJ set. Another reports staff shifts lasting 48 hours straight. Real outliers, not typos.

At first, we treated the data at face value. But as our user base grew and clients started relying on our analytics for staffing and pricing decisions, we realized we had a trust problem: the stats didn’t feel accurate. And if they didn’t feel accurate, they weren’t useful.

The root issue? No standardized input validation across venues, and no way to detect or correct anomalies before they polluted our dashboards. We needed a solution that didn’t discard data outright—but instead intelligently filtered the noise.

Taming Outliers with IQR-Based Normalization

Enter the Interquartile Range (IQR). I’d used basic statistical methods before for anomaly detection, but never in a production frontend context. This time, we applied IQR directly to guest counts and staff durations per venue, treating each as a distribution.

Here’s how it worked:

For every venue, we collected historical event data—guest counts and staff hours—over the past 90 days. Then, on the server side (via a Next.js API route), we calculated the first (Q1) and third quartiles (Q3), and used the standard IQR formula:

IQR = Q3 - Q1
Lower bound = Q1 - 1.5 * IQR
Upper bound = Q3 + 1.5 * IQR

Any guest count or staff time outside those bounds was flagged as an outlier and excluded from aggregate statistics like average attendance or typical shift length.

We didn’t delete the data—auditability matters—but we stopped letting it skew the numbers users saw. Instead, we appended a subtle tooltip: “Statistical outliers excluded to improve accuracy.”

The impact was immediate. One downtown Austin club had been reporting a "typical" event size of 1,200 guests, skewed by a single New Year’s Eve entry of 5,000. After IQR filtering? 420—much closer to reality. Staff time averages also snapped into place, helping venues benchmark labor costs more reliably.

Implementing this in a Next.js app meant doing the math in Node.js, but keeping it lean. We batched calculations per venue during scheduled syncs and cached the results—more on that in a sec.

Caching Smarter to Scale Faster

Running IQR calculations on every page load wasn’t sustainable. Our testimonial and venue stats pages were hitting the database hard, especially during peak booking season. We needed to reduce load without sacrificing freshness.

So we introduced Redis-backed caching for normalized venue statistics, keyed by venue ID and data window (e.g., venue:123:stats:90d). On each data sync—or when a new event was logged—we invalidated the relevant cache entries and re-ran the IQR pipeline asynchronously.

In Next.js, we wrapped the cache logic in a simple utility:

async function getVenueStats(venueId) {
  const cacheKey = `venue:${venueId}:stats:90d`;
  const cached = await redis.get(cacheKey);
  
  if (cached) return JSON.parse(cached);
  
  const rawData = await db.getEventHistory(venueId);
  const stats = computeIQRStats(rawData);
  
  await redis.setex(cacheKey, 3600, JSON.stringify(stats)); // 1hr TTL
  
  return stats;
}

This cut our database queries by ~70% and brought testimonial page load times down from 2.1s to under 800ms—critical for SEO and user retention.

We also added stale-while-revalidate behavior using Next.js’s revalidate in getStaticProps for public-facing pages, ensuring users always got fast responses while background jobs kept the data fresh.

The Bigger Picture: Trust Through Transparency

Cleaning messy data isn’t just about performance—it’s about credibility. By combining statistical rigor with smart caching, we turned a liability (inconsistent inputs) into a strength: analytics users can actually trust.

The 24 commits that led here weren’t flashy, but they mattered. From refining outlier thresholds to tuning cache TTLs, each tweak brought us closer to a system that just works—even when the data doesn’t.

If you’re building a Next.js app that consumes real-world data, don’t assume cleanliness. Assume chaos. Then build your filters early, validate your assumptions with stats, and cache like you mean it.

Because in the end, users don’t care how much data you have. They care that what they see makes sense.

Newer post

Building a Scalable Sitemap Architecture in Next.js: From Monolith to Modular

Older post

Building a Smart Venue-Event Matching Engine in Laravel 12: Lessons from AustinsElite