Back to Blog
4 min read

How We Stabilized Our AI API in One Day: Debugging Authentication and Data Flow at Lockline AI

Identifying the Root Causes: Tracing Failed Requests and Auth Misconfigurations

It started with a Slack alert at 9:17 a.m.—our AI lead processor had gone silent. No new leads were being generated, and the error logs were spiking with 401s and malformed responses. At Lockline AI, our API sits at the heart of the product, translating user inputs into AI-generated lead insights. When it breaks, everything stops. So I rolled up my sleeves and dove into the logs.

The first clue was subtle: inconsistent authentication failures across requests that looked identical. Some succeeded, others didn’t—same API key, same endpoint. That inconsistency screamed race condition or state mismanagement. After grepping through request traces, I spotted a pattern: requests routed through certain load balancer nodes were failing more often. That pointed to a server-side session or caching issue.

Digging deeper, I found the culprit—a misconfigured middleware layer that was conditionally bypassing API key validation under high concurrency. It was a "temporary" optimization someone (not me!) had added during early multi-provider AI integration. The logic assumed that if a request had passed auth earlier in the pipeline, it didn’t need rechecking. But with dynamic routing between OpenAI and alternative providers, that assumption collapsed. Requests were slipping through unauthenticated, then failing downstream when they hit services that expected validated context.

Worse, the error wasn’t being propagated cleanly. Instead of returning a clear 401, the API sometimes choked on null user contexts mid-processing, throwing 500s. That made debugging harder because we were chasing server errors when the real issue was upstream auth.

Fixing Data Serialization and Response Consistency Across AI Model Outputs

Once auth was stabilized, another issue surfaced: inconsistent data formatting in AI responses. Our lead generator fuses outputs from multiple models—some return JSON, others plain text or malformed objects. We had a parser layer, but it assumed uniform structure. In practice, that meant leads would occasionally come through with missing fields or nested garbage like { "data": "{\"name\": \"John\"}" }—a stringified JSON blob inside a JSON field.

This wasn’t just a cosmetic issue. Our frontend expected clean, predictable objects. When the schema broke, lead cards rendered blank, and users thought the AI had failed entirely.

The fix required two layers. First, I standardized the response envelope across all AI providers. No matter the backend model, the API now returns a consistent shape:

{
  "success": true,
  "data": { /* normalized lead object */ },
  "provider": "openai"
}

Second, I rewrote the serialization pipeline to handle coercion aggressively. If a field is expected to be a string but comes back as an object, we stringify it. If it’s missing, we default it. And if the entire response is a string that looks like JSON? We parse it—safely, with try/catch guards—and re-encode it properly.

I also added schema validation using Zod, which caught a few edge cases where AI hallucinations produced booleans in name fields (true, really). Now, every response gets validated before it leaves the API. If it doesn’t conform, we log it, fall back to defaults, and return a clean payload—never a 500.

Validating Fixes with Real-Time Testing and Monitoring

You don’t know it works until it works under fire. After deploying the changes, I didn’t just wait for errors to stop. I stress-tested.

Using a local script, I replayed a week’s worth of real user requests—edge cases, malformed payloads, expired keys—at 10x normal volume. I watched Datadog in real time: error rate flatlined. Latency dipped slightly due to added validation, but nothing outside acceptable range.

More importantly, our internal QA team confirmed that lead generation was consistent across browsers and devices. No more blank cards. No more "AI failed" messages.

We also updated our alerting rules. Now, if auth bypasses occur or response schemas deviate, we get paged immediately. We’ve gone from reactive firefighting to proactive monitoring.

This wasn’t a refactor. It was emergency stabilization—and it worked. In one day, we went from broken pipeline to rock-solid API. The lesson? Even in AI-driven apps, the real magic isn’t in the model—it’s in the plumbing. Get the data flow right, secure every hop, and suddenly, the AI can do its job without tripping over backend debt.

Newer post

How We Scaled AI Lead Scoring with Generic XAI Prompts in Lockline AI

Older post

How We Made AI Lead Scoring Context-Aware Using Weather Data and Multi-Provider Signals